FOCUS on Post-Pandemic Challenges Surrounding Administration of Justice
A Post-Pandemic Look at Virtual versus In-Person Courtrooms: Determining the Best Fit for Procedural Fairness in the Administration of Justice
Kenneth Jull
Counsel
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Nabila Abdul Malik
Partner
Fasken LLP
Virtual hearings became more commonplace as a result of the global pandemic helping to ensure the administration of justice. Now as we enter the post -pandemic era, administrative bodies are taking a closer look at the continuing use of virtual versus in-person proceedings. This panel will examine what we have learned about the virtual courtroom, how justice can be administered in a virtual setting, and how to best proceed as the pandemic fades to memory.
- What have we learned from the pandemic era about virtual versus in-person proceedings
- Identifying best practices to apply to virtual hearings vs in-person hearings
- Analyzing the consequences of having only virtual or only in-person hearings
- Understanding the costs involved for virtual versus in-person hearings and how this can restrict someone from gaining access to justice
- Does having a virtual hearing still provide Canadians with their right to a fair proceeding?
- Determining the future of virtual proceedings in administrative law settings?
- When are they effective?
- Do they still make sense in a post-pandemic world?
- Distinguishing the effects of virtual versus in-person hearings for self-regulated parties