|
|
The Canadian Institute's 6th Annual Forum
Aboriginal Law, Consultation & Accommodation
Wednesday, February 22 to Thursday, February 23, 2012
Metropolitan Hotel, Toronto, Ontario
Day 1: Wednesday, Feb 22, 2012
8:00 Registration Opens and Coffee Served
- Chief Bryan Laforme
Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation
9:15 Opening Remarks from Co-Chairs
- Robert Janes
Partner Janes Freedman Kyle Law Corporation - John Rowinski
Law Office of John Rowinski
9:30 Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources: Analyzing the Potential Far-Reaching Impacts on Your Project
- Robert Janes
Partner Janes Freedman Kyle Law Corporation - Christopher J. Matthews
Partner Aird & Berlis LLP
The recent Ontario Superior Court decision in Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources is creating a buzz across the country due to its potentially far-reaching impacts on the natural resources sector in Canada, and generally for First Nations, industry and government. Hear from counsel on the history of the case, key issues that arose at trial, and on why this is such an important decision, especially if it is left to stand on appeal.
In this session, you will gain invaluable insight from, and have your questions answered by, counsel who litigated the case.
10:30 Networking Refreshment Break
10:45 Understanding the Definition and Scope of the Duty to Consult and Accommodate Today and How It Impacts You
- Daniel Pagowski
Legal Counsel‚ Department of Justice Aboriginal Law and Strategic Polic - Christopher Devlin
Partner Devlin Gailus Barristers & Solicitors - Sandra Gogal
Partner Miller Thomson LLP
- How have recent case law developments shed light on the basic questions, such as:
- What is the scope of the duty to consult?
- When is the duty triggered? What is included in “contemplated Crown conduct”?
- How much of the duty can be delegated
a) to municipalities? b) to proponents?
- How much of what proponents do, goes towards the discharge of the Crown’s duty?
- How are Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council and Adams Lake Indian Band v. British Columbia being applied by lower courts?
- Clarifying the role of regulatory bodies with respect
to the duty to consult
- Looking at how the B.C. Court of Appeal decision in West Moberly First Nations v. British Columbia (Chief Inspector of Mines) has further shaped the Crown’s duty to consult with respect to past impacts and cumulative effects, and the issue
of Crown accommodation
- Understanding how the recent trend towards complex partnership agreements is affecting accommodation by the Crown
12:00 Networking Luncheon
1:15 Consulting with Métis Groups: Successfully Balancing and Prioritizing Rights in Light of Recent Developments across Canada
- Melanie Paradis
Director of Lands Resources and Consultation Métis Nation of Ontario - Catherine Stewart
Crown Counsel Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General
- How might cases arising across the country, such as
R. v. Hirsekorn and R. v. Jones, and other cases dealing with effective control and geographic scope of Métis communities, affect consultations?
- How is the duty to consult with Métis groups currently being applied in Quebec?
- Strategies for ensuring “meaningful consultation” with Métis groups interests in consultations
- Effectively determining whether there are Métis interests at stake in a project-How should an asserted Métis right be evaluated
with respect to a territory where a treaty has application?
- What does the future of Métis rights recognition look like in light of recent developments involving Métis adhesion to Treaty and the potential settlement of Métis land claims (Manitoba Métis Federation v. the Province of Manitoba)?
2:15 Networking Refreshment Break
2:30 Strategies for Successfully Litigating Consultation Cases
- Malliha Wilson
Assistant Deputy Attorney General, Legal Services Division Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General - Ben A. Jetten
Partner Blake‚ Cassels & Graydon
Gain critical insight from leading Aboriginal Law counsel, on considerations that should be taken into account at the start of any consultation case, key evidentiary issues that are likely to arise, and
how to successfully manage them.
- Determining when it is appropriate to pursue an issue in court
- Utilizing oral and elder history/testimony and other unique evidentiary issues
- Assessing alternatives to judicial review: successfully utilizing declaratory remedies
- Unique considerations for costs orders, such as advanced
costs orders, and how to successfully include costs issues
in negotiations
3:30 Ensuring the Right Parties are Included in Consultations to Avoid Complications Down the Line
- Neal J. Smitheman
Partner Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP - Louis P. Strezos
Louis P. Strezos & Associate‚ Barristers & Solicitors
- Derek Teevan
Vice President, Aboriginal and Government Affairs Detour Gold Corporation
- What obligation does the Crown have to ensure the appropriate First Nations groups are consulted?
- How to effectively address disagreement with Crown lists outlining groups to be consulted
- Effectively interacting with political entities not recognized
by the Indian Act, claiming to represent a certain group
- Case Study: Brantford (City of) v. Montour
- Managing the significant delays, costs and legal issues resulting from parties not being consulted
4:30 Co-Chair's Closing Remarks & Conference Adjourns
Day 2: Thursday, Feb 23, 2012
9:15 Co-Chairs’ Opening Remarks
9:30 Achieving Successful and Efficient Interaction between Federal and Provincial Crowns
- Ross Barclay
Senior Advisor - Major Projects, Consultation and Accommodation Unit, Policy and Strategic Direction Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Developmen Canada
- What obligations do the provinces have to respect treaty
rights in the light of Keewatin?
- How to effectively manage differing policy processes of various Crowns, particularly in a multi-jurisdictional context
- Examining requirements of various pieces of Federal legislation, such as the First Nations Land Management Act, and how they intersect with Provincial responsibilities
- Analyzing formal and informal strategies for Provincial
and Federal governments to work more harmoniously together
10:30 Networking Refreshment Break
10:45 Critical Update on Consultation Issues Arising out of Quebec: Plan Nordk
- Pierre- Christian Labeau
Norton Rose OR LLP - Nadir André
Partner BCF Business Law
Plan Nord, an initiative of the Province of Quebec, anticipates $80-billion in development in Northern Quebec over the next 25 years. While its goal is to develop the area’s natural resources and shape the economic future of the area, including Aboriginal communities, and the province as a whole, it also comes with a whole host of serious issues for the Aboriginal groups being impacted. This session will address hot issues involving treaty rights, consultation and accommodation, and resulting litigation, that could potentially impact you, no matter where you are across Canada.
- What are the specific environmental concerns that are being raised and what accommodation options are there?
- How is the government balancing overlapping rights of First Nations who are signatories to the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement and the Northeastern Quebec Agreement, and those who are not but within the territory of Plan Nord?
- Analyzing the possibility of the federal government negotiating the rights of the First Nations whose rights were extinguished
in 1977, and possible implications
- Case Study: Getting up to date on issues arising out of litigation between First Nations groups in the province
- How is the duty to consult with Métis groups in Quebec being brought to the forefront by Plan Nord?
12:00 Networking Luncheon
1:15 Key Legal Developments on Consultation and Accommodation Surrounding Environmental and Archaeological Issues
- Nancy Kleer
Partner Olthuis Kleer Townshend LLP - Paul General
Manager Six Nations Eco-centre - Annie Thuan
Rueter Scargall Bennett LLP
- How are recent developments in both Aboriginal law
and environmental law impacting the duty to consult,
and proponents’ projects?
- Analyzing the way courts are applying the definition and scope of “accommodation” with respect to environmental impacts, after West Moberly First Nations v. British Columbia
(Chief Inspector of Mines)
- Effectively assembling and presenting Traditional Ecological Knowledge (“TEK”) for the purposes of environmental assessments
- How much weight are regulators currently placing on TEK?
- Case Study: successfully consulting with Aboriginal communities and effectively drafting an Environmental Impact Statement
- Archaeological discoveries on construction projects: minimizing project delays and cost through effective consultations with Aboriginal communities
- What are the legal requirements for developers upon archaeological discoveries, and the practical implications involved?
- Determining what constitutes “consultation” at various
stages of an archaeological assessment, required pursuant
to the Heritage Act
- Ensuring compliance with the Cemeteries Act
2:30 Networking Refreshment Break
2:45 Ongoing Consultation and Opening Lines of Communication to Maximize Project Success
- Cynthia Westaway
Aboriginal Law Practice Leader Ottawa Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Consultation is not a step to be checked off on a proponent’s list of tasks prior to gaining licensing and approvals. Successful proponents recognize the importance of ongoing communication with impacted Aboriginal communities, and maintaining a healthy, open dialogue throughout a project life-cycle, which could last many years. Learn from proven strategies to maintaining open communication, which will ultimately increase the bottom line of all parties involved. Round out the skills and strategies you have learned by participating in an interactive exercise with
your fellow delegates!
- Successful strategies for implementing government issued guidelines: setting up protocols, meetings and other procedures
- Looking at implementation of a signed agreement and how
it blends with consultation
- Consulting with the communities: fulfilling the band council’s fiduciary duty
- Examining ways to manage expectations of all parties involved, throughout the consultation process
4:00 Co-Chairs’ Closing Remarks & Conference Concludes
|